
Introduction:
The tragic killing of senior Supreme Court lawyer Advocate Abdul Razzaq Shar in a drive-by shooting has taken a new turn as his son has registered a case against PTI chief Imran Khan. The son alleges that his father was targeted at the behest of Imran Khan, claiming a connection to a treason case. This incident has led to a blame game between the government and the PTI, with both sides accusing each other of involvement. Let's delve into the details of this case, the accusations, and the legal proceedings.
The Murder of Advocate Abdul Razzaq Shar:
Advocate Shar was fatally shot near Alamo Chowk on Airport Road while on his way to the Balochistan High Court. Unidentified assailants, armed with automatic weapons, targeted his vehicle, leaving him with multiple bullet injuries. The lawyer tragically succumbed to his wounds at the scene. In response to his untimely demise, lawyers' bodies across the province have boycotted court proceedings and declared three days of mourning.
Accusations and Counter-Accusations:
Following the incident, both the government and the PTI exchanged blame regarding the motive behind the murder. Prime Minister's aide Attaullah Tarar alleged that Imran Khan orchestrated the killing to evade accountability in a treason case. On the other hand, PTI spokesperson Raoof Hassan accused Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah of being involved in the murder. The tensions escalated due to a constitutional petition filed by Shar against Imran Khan, seeking legal action under Article 6 for high treason.
The Case Registration and Allegations:
The son of the deceased, Advocate Siraj Ahmed, registered an FIR at Quetta's Shaheed Jamil police station. The FIR accuses Imran Khan and others from the PTI of intentional murder and abetment, citing sections of the Pakistan Penal Code and the Anti-Terrorism Act. Ahmed firmly believes that his father's murder was connected to the case he filed against the PTI chief. He claims that his father had received threats regarding the case and alleges the involvement of Imran Khan.
Lawyers' Boycott and Demands for Justice:
Lawyers in Balochistan have extended their boycott of court proceedings as a mark of protest. The boycott will continue for three days, and lawyers demand a transparent investigation into Shar's killing. They vow to persevere until the culprits are apprehended and justice is served. The Balochistan High Court Bar Association has condemned the government's hasty accusations against Imran Khan, calling for restraint and immediate filing of the murder FIR.
Conclusion:
The registration of a case against Imran Khan in connection with the murder of Advocate Abdul Razzaq Shar has brought this tragic incident into the spotlight. The allegations and counter-accusations between the government and the PTI add complexity to the case. As lawyers demand justice and a thorough investigation, the outcome of this investigation will determine the course of justice and shed light on the truth behind the unfortunate demise of Advocate Shar.
EmoticonEmoticon